|
|
Complimentary from the publishers of
VBP News
March 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"We’ve got the best treatment; we know that we want to give this
treatment. It’s evidence based. But if the patient doesn’t take the
medicine, or doesn’t do the treatment, doesn’t go to all their radiation
appointments, then what good it is? So having patients educated, having
them be part of that process, having access to information, these are
very powerful tools that we have to leverage. Having not just
provider-facing tools, but patient-facing tools we can leverage to
engage patients into the process, that’s going to help a lot with
value-based care."
- Dr. Bobby Reddy, Chief Medical Officer, NantHealth.
|
|
|
|
An advanced payment
model in Maryland provided prospective payments to 7 Federally Qualified
Health Centers (FQHCs) "based on their patient population size and total
historical cost. The FQHCs used their payments primarily for outreach
and care coordination resources, and to develop processes and structures
to improve care delivery outcomes." After 3 years, an assessment across
all 7 FQHCs showed 35% fewer emergency department visits and 11% fewer
hospitalizations for Medicaid beneficiaries. The
model's "3-year investment of $4.4M yielded a cumulative cost savings of
$19.4M, resulting in a cumulative 3:1 return on investment."
Source:
"Implementing Value-Based Primary Care Delivery in Federally Qualified
Health Centers," Population Health Management, February 24, 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How to achieve cost savings through post-acute network
collaboration
As value-based programs become more prevalent, healthcare
leaders are realizing their organization's financial viability
is inherently tied to more effective collaboration efforts with
post-acute care networks. Discover how a health system achieved
risk-based contracting with their post-acute network and reduced
readmissions by 52 percent, cut length of stay by 43 percent and
achieved a $4M cost savings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DataGen: 5 Reasons Why VBP Might Not Become the Primary
Revenue Model in the next 5 years
1. The fee-for-service mindset and model are too deeply
entrenched.
2. Clinical staff resistance to value-based payment.
3. The incentives aren't high enough.
4. Many organizations lack the resources and knowledge necessary
to take on risk.
5. Healthcare is too volatile to handle the change.
Note: A third of respondents in a survey of 102 healthcare
executives, commissioned by DataGen and conducted by Sage Growth
Partners, did not think value-based payments will replace
traditional fee-for-service in the next 5 years.
Source:
DataGen, "Market Report: The next leap in value-based care" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
VBP Collaboration: Cigna and Houston Methodist; Blue Shield of
California and Accolade; Jefferson Health and Independence Blue
Cross.
-
Viewpoints: MC-Rx Says ‘Independent PBM Clients Lower Drug Prices by
37% in 1st Year’ by LaMar Williams
-
50% Believe Use of the Right Analytics and Technology is ‘Most
Crucial Element’ in Succeeding in VBC
-
Industry News with briefs regarding Change Healthcare; Humana.
-
Click
here to subscribe to VBP News
-
Click here to view a brief (under 2 minutes) video with more
information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Follow Health Policy Publishing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|